<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of The Clownvertising Virus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/</link>
	<description>Walter Naeslund. Founder and CEO of The Advertising Agency Honesty. Professional Speaker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Swedes Rock in Advertising Competitions &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Swedes Rock in Advertising Competitions &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 09:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>[...] to help our clients reach goals, not primarily score gold statuettes and pens. That only encourages clownvertising and other deceases. But when it comes to college competitions I&#8217;m a bit more positive. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to help our clients reach goals, not primarily score gold statuettes and pens. That only encourages clownvertising and other deceases. But when it comes to college competitions I&#8217;m a bit more positive. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANGER WARNING: Amazing a New Advertising Award! The Golden Gut 2010. &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-5387</link>
		<dc:creator>ANGER WARNING: Amazing a New Advertising Award! The Golden Gut 2010. &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-5387</guid>
		<description>[...] term Clownvertising was coined in 2009. This was no coincidence. It was a year of rampant clownvertising because of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] term Clownvertising was coined in 2009. This was no coincidence. It was a year of rampant clownvertising because of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital kultur &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Två anledningar till varför humor i reklam ofta misslyckas</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-5185</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital kultur &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Två anledningar till varför humor i reklam ofta misslyckas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-5185</guid>
		<description>[...] Ett uttryck som jag bara älskar är clownvertising. Jag tror att uttrycket är Walter Naeslunds skapelse och han har skrivit om begreppet i sitt blogginlägg Beware of the clownvertising virus. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ett uttryck som jag bara älskar är clownvertising. Jag tror att uttrycket är Walter Naeslunds skapelse och han har skrivit om begreppet i sitt blogginlägg Beware of the clownvertising virus. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Naeslund</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4572</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Naeslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4572</guid>
		<description>@Park Howell
I read your well written post with great interest, and I think this is an important discussion to take. I agree with your points on &quot;good advertising&quot;. 

The problem that I see both in reality and in portfolios though is that &quot;funny&quot; is enough, and that too many shoehorn the &quot;fun&quot; position into the strategy just to give their creatives a free ride on the viral train. Because, let&#039;s face it, creating &quot;funny and irrelevant&quot; is not &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; hard if you have somebody else&#039;s (your client&#039;s) budget to play clown with. What &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; hard, and what is also our purpose, is to do &quot;valuable and relevant&quot;, to create a win-win barter between our client and their fan base.

In my mind, having Volkswagen in the &quot;fun&quot; position is like saying that Justin Timberlake is &lt;em&gt;the king of pop&lt;/em&gt;. He just isn&#039;t, no matter how many moonwalks he tries. The &quot;fun&quot; position could &lt;em&gt;possibly&lt;/em&gt; have worked for BMW, Mini Cooper or Smart, but for Volkswagen? Never. The Fun Theory is simply a free ride for the creative team and an irrelevant campaign for Volkswagen. It&#039;s the school book example of clownvertising, and it&#039;s also the one I&#039;m using in my lectures to illustrate the phenomenon. 

Trust me, you&#039;ll get a lot of portfolios coming to your office pretty soon with advertising students trying to motivate the &quot;fun&quot; position for all kinds of different brands because it&#039;s the easiest one to do creative on. It&#039;s really nothing new. Before the age of &quot;viral&quot; we saw a lot of&lt;em&gt; &quot;the strategy is that there is no strategy&quot;&lt;/em&gt;-strategies when somebody wanted to motivate a &quot;pretty&quot; but utterly irrelevant ad. And it&#039;s not only in ad schools. Diesel actually tried to claim that precise non-strategy about a year ago.

So, I agree and I don&#039;t agree – which is the situation which usually leads to interesting discussion. Thanks for taking the time to comment, and also congrats on an excellent blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Park Howell<br />
I read your well written post with great interest, and I think this is an important discussion to take. I agree with your points on &#8220;good advertising&#8221;. </p>
<p>The problem that I see both in reality and in portfolios though is that &#8220;funny&#8221; is enough, and that too many shoehorn the &#8220;fun&#8221; position into the strategy just to give their creatives a free ride on the viral train. Because, let&#8217;s face it, creating &#8220;funny and irrelevant&#8221; is not <em>that</em> hard if you have somebody else&#8217;s (your client&#8217;s) budget to play clown with. What <em>is</em> hard, and what is also our purpose, is to do &#8220;valuable and relevant&#8221;, to create a win-win barter between our client and their fan base.</p>
<p>In my mind, having Volkswagen in the &#8220;fun&#8221; position is like saying that Justin Timberlake is <em>the king of pop</em>. He just isn&#8217;t, no matter how many moonwalks he tries. The &#8220;fun&#8221; position could <em>possibly</em> have worked for BMW, Mini Cooper or Smart, but for Volkswagen? Never. The Fun Theory is simply a free ride for the creative team and an irrelevant campaign for Volkswagen. It&#8217;s the school book example of clownvertising, and it&#8217;s also the one I&#8217;m using in my lectures to illustrate the phenomenon. </p>
<p>Trust me, you&#8217;ll get a lot of portfolios coming to your office pretty soon with advertising students trying to motivate the &#8220;fun&#8221; position for all kinds of different brands because it&#8217;s the easiest one to do creative on. It&#8217;s really nothing new. Before the age of &#8220;viral&#8221; we saw a lot of<em> &#8220;the strategy is that there is no strategy&#8221;</em>-strategies when somebody wanted to motivate a &#8220;pretty&#8221; but utterly irrelevant ad. And it&#8217;s not only in ad schools. Diesel actually tried to claim that precise non-strategy about a year ago.</p>
<p>So, I agree and I don&#8217;t agree – which is the situation which usually leads to interesting discussion. Thanks for taking the time to comment, and also congrats on an excellent blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Sundén</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Sundén</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>@DangerousDolly I couldn&#039;t agree more: &quot;A linkbaiting creative that actually communicates the brand would be the best example of course ;)&quot;

I will try to write a blog post about what I mean, can&#039;t promise that it will be up this week - have some other posts that got to come out first and they are all about... Link Bait! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DangerousDolly I couldn&#8217;t agree more: &#8220;A linkbaiting creative that actually communicates the brand would be the best example of course <img src='http://walternaeslund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>I will try to write a blog post about what I mean, can&#8217;t promise that it will be up this week &#8211; have some other posts that got to come out first and they are all about&#8230; Link Bait! <img src='http://walternaeslund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Park Howell</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4554</link>
		<dc:creator>Park Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4554</guid>
		<description>&quot;Good&quot; advertising is about telling great stories that involve your customers. It can be humorous, heartfelt, sad, scary, you name it.  I agree with Adners that the most difficult part about being funny in your ads is actually being funny.  However, I think advertisers and their agencies often take themselves (oursleves) way too seriously. Having a little fun with our work has always been beneficial for all involved.  I wrote a post on Monday about Volkswagen&#039;s http://thefuntheory.com/ campaign. I like it because it engages its customers in fun and entertaining ways to, &quot;Change behaviors for the better.&quot; I like it because it&#039;s a nice expression of the Volkswagen brand, it involves its customers in a tangible way, and it&#039;s viral. These are all wins in my book, and the humor is found in the cleverness of the ideas coming from the every-day person. You can read the article here: http://bit.ly/64KCJr 

Please let me know what you think of their campaign and my thoughts on the subject of &quot;Fun in advertising&quot; by commenting on the post.

Great article, Walter, and thank you for sending me a note this morning. I was in Stockholm 7 years ago and loved it! Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Good&#8221; advertising is about telling great stories that involve your customers. It can be humorous, heartfelt, sad, scary, you name it.  I agree with Adners that the most difficult part about being funny in your ads is actually being funny.  However, I think advertisers and their agencies often take themselves (oursleves) way too seriously. Having a little fun with our work has always been beneficial for all involved.  I wrote a post on Monday about Volkswagen&#8217;s <a href="http://thefuntheory.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thefuntheory.com/</a> campaign. I like it because it engages its customers in fun and entertaining ways to, &#8220;Change behaviors for the better.&#8221; I like it because it&#8217;s a nice expression of the Volkswagen brand, it involves its customers in a tangible way, and it&#8217;s viral. These are all wins in my book, and the humor is found in the cleverness of the ideas coming from the every-day person. You can read the article here: <a href="http://bit.ly/64KCJr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/64KCJr</a> </p>
<p>Please let me know what you think of their campaign and my thoughts on the subject of &#8220;Fun in advertising&#8221; by commenting on the post.</p>
<p>Great article, Walter, and thank you for sending me a note this morning. I was in Stockholm 7 years ago and loved it! Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DangerousDolly</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>DangerousDolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>@Walter @Simon

Guys, you both have interesting angles on this and I would really like to read another post (or two) about examples. Not necessarily ones that you KNOW to be baiting or just clownvertising - but those that you would describe as such.

A linkbaiting creative that actually communicates the brand would be the best example of course ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Walter @Simon</p>
<p>Guys, you both have interesting angles on this and I would really like to read another post (or two) about examples. Not necessarily ones that you KNOW to be baiting or just clownvertising &#8211; but those that you would describe as such.</p>
<p>A linkbaiting creative that actually communicates the brand would be the best example of course <img src='http://walternaeslund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Naeslund</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Naeslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Yes. Like I said, #clownbaiting (or #linkbaiting in non-walter-lingo) is a useful tool. #clownvertising however is when there is no valid strategy, and where a &quot;fun&quot;-positioning is shoehorned into a strategy just to give creatives an free ride on the viral train.

It ruins creative output much the same way cocaine ruins human happiness – it&#039;s basically an easy way out.

Did you know, by the way, that Wikipedia has the following to say about shoehorns: &quot;A shoehorn, sometimes called shoefucker...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Like I said, #clownbaiting (or #linkbaiting in non-walter-lingo) is a useful tool. #clownvertising however is when there is no valid strategy, and where a &#8220;fun&#8221;-positioning is shoehorned into a strategy just to give creatives an free ride on the viral train.</p>
<p>It ruins creative output much the same way cocaine ruins human happiness – it&#8217;s basically an easy way out.</p>
<p>Did you know, by the way, that Wikipedia has the following to say about shoehorns: &#8220;A shoehorn, sometimes called shoefucker&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Sundén</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4548</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Sundén</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4548</guid>
		<description>I do get your point Walter, but...

I will never embrace a word like #clownbaiting for this! These things can be so crucial regarding Marketing, Link Baiting, Viral Marketing and everything else.

By referring it to a clown makes it a bit of a rant instead of embracing how important it can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do get your point Walter, but&#8230;</p>
<p>I will never embrace a word like #clownbaiting for this! These things can be so crucial regarding Marketing, Link Baiting, Viral Marketing and everything else.</p>
<p>By referring it to a clown makes it a bit of a rant instead of embracing how important it can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Naeslund</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-4547</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Naeslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/beware-of-the-clownvertising-virus/#comment-4547</guid>
		<description>Precisely. But then fan acquisition or link generation (for instance) is part of the strategy. Then it&#039;s not #clownvertising any more, but #clownbaiting. It&#039;s like the difference between salt on popcorn och eating salt with a spoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely. But then fan acquisition or link generation (for instance) is part of the strategy. Then it&#8217;s not #clownvertising any more, but #clownbaiting. It&#8217;s like the difference between salt on popcorn och eating salt with a spoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

