<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defence of Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/</link>
	<description>Walter Naeslund. Founder and CEO of The Advertising Agency Honesty. Professional Speaker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Wave is Dead, Long Live Google Wave! &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-7129</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Wave is Dead, Long Live Google Wave! &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-7129</guid>
		<description>[...] to long ago, I wrote a post in defense of Wave. My main thesis was that Wave is not a service, but a technology set, and as such, an interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to long ago, I wrote a post in defense of Wave. My main thesis was that Wave is not a service, but a technology set, and as such, an interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Management in Google Wave &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5472</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Management in Google Wave &#8211; WalterNaeslund.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5472</guid>
		<description>[...] reading about the Rasmussen brothers – you know the Danish Google-guys behind Maps and Wave. I&#8217;ve written about this before, but I really think it&#8217;s time to revisit Wave with the critical eye replaced by the creative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading about the Rasmussen brothers – you know the Danish Google-guys behind Maps and Wave. I&#8217;ve written about this before, but I really think it&#8217;s time to revisit Wave with the critical eye replaced by the creative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>You Are Right! Beware of humankind&#039;s understanding and adoption capacity (40 years to adopt email) and of majorities&#039; opinions especially : )

GO WAVE , GO ENTREPRENEURS, GO INNOVATORS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Are Right! Beware of humankind&#8217;s understanding and adoption capacity (40 years to adopt email) and of majorities&#8217; opinions especially : )</p>
<p>GO WAVE , GO ENTREPRENEURS, GO INNOVATORS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Tong Strömberg</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Tong Strömberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5125</guid>
		<description>Google Wave an epic failure? I am a bit surprised to see that too given (as Kent points out) it´s still only in preview. 

That said, adding to your list of &quot;technological revamps&quot;, I think it´s worth pointing out that the whole idea behind Wave is as Lars Rasmussen described it at Google I/O several months ago: &quot;We set out to answer the question: What would email look like if we set out to invent it today?&quot; 

Since Google have Gmail which is one of the major email services around. The obvious question for me is: Then when and how will you turn Gmail users Wave users? If the whole idea is a reinvention of mail, then why not just do it? Convert email to wave and start with Gmail. I think this is what Google will do too (at least if they believe in the Wave product which I hope they do). When and how will they do it? Wrote a post about this a few months ago btw:

http://tongstromberg.com/2009/09/30/gmail-turns-wave/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Wave an epic failure? I am a bit surprised to see that too given (as Kent points out) it´s still only in preview. </p>
<p>That said, adding to your list of &#8220;technological revamps&#8221;, I think it´s worth pointing out that the whole idea behind Wave is as Lars Rasmussen described it at Google I/O several months ago: &#8220;We set out to answer the question: What would email look like if we set out to invent it today?&#8221; </p>
<p>Since Google have Gmail which is one of the major email services around. The obvious question for me is: Then when and how will you turn Gmail users Wave users? If the whole idea is a reinvention of mail, then why not just do it? Convert email to wave and start with Gmail. I think this is what Google will do too (at least if they believe in the Wave product which I hope they do). When and how will they do it? Wrote a post about this a few months ago btw:</p>
<p><a href="http://tongstromberg.com/2009/09/30/gmail-turns-wave/" rel="nofollow">http://tongstromberg.com/2009/09/30/gmail-turns-wave/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Buscall</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Buscall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this one. Wave has a lot of potential and I don&#039;t really think we&#039;ll see it at its best until more people are using it. 

I find it very useful as a collaborative writing tool and liaising with customers. In the past Basecamp has been my collaboration tool of choice but Wave is much more immediate. 

I would like to see Google develop and adapt the interface. At the moment it&#039;s too much like email and as such limits people to thinking about it as an email-like tool. 

Lets see what 2010 brings for Wavers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one. Wave has a lot of potential and I don&#8217;t really think we&#8217;ll see it at its best until more people are using it. </p>
<p>I find it very useful as a collaborative writing tool and liaising with customers. In the past Basecamp has been my collaboration tool of choice but Wave is much more immediate. </p>
<p>I would like to see Google develop and adapt the interface. At the moment it&#8217;s too much like email and as such limits people to thinking about it as an email-like tool. </p>
<p>Lets see what 2010 brings for Wavers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Flodqvist</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5072</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Flodqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5072</guid>
		<description>I agree, I also think this is just the beginning. 

The one failure Google may be guilty of here however is the way they launched Waves. By launching it with invites they built a hype that they couldn&#039;t meet at this stage. A big part of why they couldn&#039;t meet the demands is because at this stage it is a closed community. When they launched gmail through invites people could send e-mail to their friends who didn&#039;t have gmail and still benefit from the positive sides of gmail. 

With Google Waves there really aren&#039;t much to do if your friends, co-workers and other acquaintences don&#039;t have it. And in most cases it doesn&#039;t make a very big difference if ONE of your friends have Waves, since it is a community tool. That is where I see the big advantages in Waves from my point of view as a communication theorist. 

So I think Waves will be big in the future. It has far too much good opportunities not to be a hit. However, they shouldn&#039;t have launched it by building they hype by cutting they supply (i.e. through invites). They probably wanted to test the beta in a smaller group, but at the same time they created a demand in people to get it, which in this case gave them a minor disadvantage i think. In the short run. In the long run I don&#039;t think people will remember that miscount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I also think this is just the beginning. </p>
<p>The one failure Google may be guilty of here however is the way they launched Waves. By launching it with invites they built a hype that they couldn&#8217;t meet at this stage. A big part of why they couldn&#8217;t meet the demands is because at this stage it is a closed community. When they launched gmail through invites people could send e-mail to their friends who didn&#8217;t have gmail and still benefit from the positive sides of gmail. </p>
<p>With Google Waves there really aren&#8217;t much to do if your friends, co-workers and other acquaintences don&#8217;t have it. And in most cases it doesn&#8217;t make a very big difference if ONE of your friends have Waves, since it is a community tool. That is where I see the big advantages in Waves from my point of view as a communication theorist. </p>
<p>So I think Waves will be big in the future. It has far too much good opportunities not to be a hit. However, they shouldn&#8217;t have launched it by building they hype by cutting they supply (i.e. through invites). They probably wanted to test the beta in a smaller group, but at the same time they created a demand in people to get it, which in this case gave them a minor disadvantage i think. In the short run. In the long run I don&#8217;t think people will remember that miscount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vks</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>vks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>Thank you for ur post!
I have visited a nice tutorial about google wave here http://freshnewz.co.cc/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for ur post!<br />
I have visited a nice tutorial about google wave here <a href="http://freshnewz.co.cc/" rel="nofollow">http://freshnewz.co.cc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Ehlén</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Ehlén</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>Like! I also believe Google Wave is neither a fad nor a failure, but rather a glimpse of the future of collaborative tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like! I also believe Google Wave is neither a fad nor a failure, but rather a glimpse of the future of collaborative tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/in-defence-of-google-wave/#comment-5058</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see people who understand Google Wave! From my perspective it&#039;s only a preview. It&#039;s what it says in the top left corner. And for me that means also pre-beta. To say it&#039;s one of the years epic failure is so wrong and not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see people who understand Google Wave! From my perspective it&#8217;s only a preview. It&#8217;s what it says in the top left corner. And for me that means also pre-beta. To say it&#8217;s one of the years epic failure is so wrong and not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

