<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Apple and Communicative Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walternaeslund.com/thoughts-on-apple-and-communicative-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walternaeslund.com/thoughts-on-apple-and-communicative-design/</link>
	<description>Walter Naeslund. Founder and CEO of The Advertising Agency Honesty. Professional Speaker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theplanninglab</title>
		<link>http://walternaeslund.com/thoughts-on-apple-and-communicative-design/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>theplanninglab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walternaeslund.com/?p=325#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I agree that models simplify, but the purpose is not too make things simpler, but to outline a path or strucuture to to achieve X. This tool or strategy can be as simple or as complex as possible. What matters is the abilitity to execute and the scale and scope of the problem. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Unfortunately, too many consultants override a problem analyses to sell quick solutions, either by examples (these are more like snapshots of output), or at best by case studies (by definition out of context and hard to follow).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That’s the main problem I have with using “blockbuster” examples. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Another thing concerning innovation: key drivers are often internal, not external. Imagination, creativity, leadership, processes, timing, etc might be more relevant for delivering innovation than outside-examples (not to be confused with “thinking outside the box”). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I prefer focussing on the client problem/scenario-building instead. But that’s a matter of taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that models simplify, but the purpose is not too make things simpler, but to outline a path or strucuture to to achieve X. This tool or strategy can be as simple or as complex as possible. What matters is the abilitity to execute and the scale and scope of the problem. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, too many consultants override a problem analyses to sell quick solutions, either by examples (these are more like snapshots of output), or at best by case studies (by definition out of context and hard to follow).  </p>
<p>That’s the main problem I have with using “blockbuster” examples. </p>
<p>Another thing concerning innovation: key drivers are often internal, not external. Imagination, creativity, leadership, processes, timing, etc might be more relevant for delivering innovation than outside-examples (not to be confused with “thinking outside the box”). </p>
<p>I prefer focussing on the client problem/scenario-building instead. But that’s a matter of taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

